You are here: Home > Case Library > Keklik -v- Coles
Case Library

Keklik -v- Coles - Small claims costs in child claims

We argued that small claims costs should apply to this child claim that settled for £250; the claimant disagreed on account of the fact that the claimant was a child. Held on appeal that the mere fact that the claimant is a child does not prevent allocation to the small claims track, and small claims costs were reasonable and proportionate on the facts of this case.